<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordtracker.com Hidden Text HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shihengcheong.com/blog/2008/10/wordtrackercom-hidden-text-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shihengcheong.com/blog/2008/10/wordtrackercom-hidden-text-html/</link>
	<description>Singapore SEO Specialist and Search Marketing Consultant based in Singapore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 23:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Tan</title>
		<link>http://shihengcheong.com/blog/2008/10/wordtrackercom-hidden-text-html/comment-page-1/#comment-65011</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shihengcheong.com/blog/?p=190#comment-65011</guid>
		<description>Of no offense to Willy, I think your conclusion might be wrong. Being aesthetic is one thing, but for whatever reason should WT place information on non-viewable location? Since it&#039;s not even viewable, why bother to include that text/data/info in the site? If it&#039;s spam, it&#039;s spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of no offense to Willy, I think your conclusion might be wrong. Being aesthetic is one thing, but for whatever reason should WT place information on non-viewable location? Since it&#8217;s not even viewable, why bother to include that text/data/info in the site? If it&#8217;s spam, it&#8217;s spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy Lim - Small Business Marketing Expert</title>
		<link>http://shihengcheong.com/blog/2008/10/wordtrackercom-hidden-text-html/comment-page-1/#comment-42014</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy Lim - Small Business Marketing Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shihengcheong.com/blog/?p=190#comment-42014</guid>
		<description>http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66353
&quot;If your site is perceived to contain hidden text and links that are deceptive in intent, your site may be removed from the Google index, and will not appear in search results pages.&quot;

I think the key is whether it is &quot;deceptive in intent&quot;, and for the case of Wordtracker, it&#039;s probably more for aesthetic web design purposes, rather than to trick Google.

Willy Lim
http://www.NetProfitQuest.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=66353" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=66353</a><br />
&#8220;If your site is perceived to contain hidden text and links that are deceptive in intent, your site may be removed from the Google index, and will not appear in search results pages.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the key is whether it is &#8220;deceptive in intent&#8221;, and for the case of Wordtracker, it&#8217;s probably more for aesthetic web design purposes, rather than to trick Google.</p>
<p>Willy Lim<br />
<a href="http://www.NetProfitQuest.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.NetProfitQuest.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

